Continue reading »
In the final post in this series (delayed I know), I’ll offer some thoughts on just one or two of the issues that most concern me about how some trainers and behaviour professionals approach “aggression” cases in dogs. This I’ll contrast with more established and informed methods of B-Mod (behaviour modification), as well as some of the advantages of more recent advances, incorporating an assessment of emotion and mood and its relationship to behaviour. I do this for a simple reason – since I first started working in this field I have been consistently alarmed at just how many ‘trainers’, ‘consultants’ and ‘behaviourists’ continue to ply a very lucrative trade based on claims of knowledge and expertise, or near-miraculous instinctive skills, they appear not to possess.
Recent articles
- Dominance: Empathy, Cooperation, Fairness and Reciprocity in Animals?
- Dominance: Top Dogs Pull Rank
- The Weird Reality of Cat’s Tongues
- Other-blaming and collateral damage
- Local Dog Whisperer: Rehabilitation isn’t ‘cure’ – Part 3
- Local Dog Whisperer: Whispering Sweet Nothings – Part 2
- Local ‘Dog Whisperer’s’ dogs bite.. again: The Incidents – Part I
- One year ends, another begins..
- The flipside of holidays
- Videos: Recent scientific research about dogs.. and us.
- The ties that bind
- The fireworks menace: thoughts and some tips
- Videos: Jaak Panksepp
- Emotions Are Back
- Is the Humane Movement promoting controversial breeds?
- Pit Bulls: Part 2 – History and genetics
- A little time for reflection
- Township Dog Attacks 3: Animal Birth Control
- Township Dog Attacks 2: Labels shape expectations
- Dogs kill toddler in Cape Town
Recent Comments
- pearson on Local ‘Dog Whisperer’s’ dogs bite.. again: The Incidents – Part I
- Claire G on Dominance: Empathy, Cooperation, Fairness and Reciprocity in Animals?
- Dominique on People, animals and values in a complex country
- Claire G on Other-blaming and collateral damage
- Stanley de Jager on Local Dog Whisperer: Rehabilitation isn’t ‘cure’ – Part 3
